| − | (2) He exhibits his intimate parts for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the performer or of some other individual under conditions where the actor knows or reasonably expects he will probably be found by someone who because of mental disease or defect is unable to comprehend the sexual nature of the actor's conduct.<br />(1) He exposes his intimate parts for the intent of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of the performer or of every other person under circumstances where the actor knows or reasonably anticipates he will probably be detected by a kid who's less than 13 years of age where the actor is at least four years older compared to the kid.<br />This subsection is, in addition, unrelated to naturists because, as I understand it, sexual gratification isn't born at your events. If anyone under the age of 13 years old is present, or anyone with diminished capability exists, you should be especially strict about controlling anyone pleasuring themselves or others inappropriately. In any event, the criminal isn't the person who hosts the party, but the individual committing the action. At worst you could be charged as an accessory a charge that would just stick if you actively encouraged the act.<br />Statute: NJSA 2C:24-4 Endangering welfare of kids.<br />Description: degree.<br />This particularly includes nudity but only when nudity is depicted for the purpose of sexual gratification. That's not the reason for a naturist event. Again, the possible Defendant here is the kid's parent, not you, so long as you aren't claiming to provide any form of childcare service.<br />Legislative Act: NJSA2C:33-12.2. Sexually oriented business, hassle; crime<br />2. a. As used in this action:<br />(a) A commercial establishment which as one of its primary business purposes offers for sale, lease, or exhibit the following:<br />Publications, magazines, periodicals or other printed material, or photos, films, motion pictures, video cassettes, slides or other visual representations which depict or describe a "specified sexual activity" or "specified anatomical area"; or still or motion picture machines, projectors or other image-producing devices which reveal images to one person per machine at any one time, and where the images so displayed are characterized by the depiction of a "specified sexual activity" or "specified anatomical area"; or instruments, devices, or paraphernalia which are designed to be used in connection with a "specified sexual activity"; or<br />So long as you aren't selling any depictions of nudity, this does not apply to you.<br />As long as there are not any performances or movies shown at the big event, this doesn't apply to you personally.<br />Legislative Act: NJSA 2C:34-2.Description: mature<br />Description: section:<br />Description: details:<br />Description: genitals,<br />Description: and<br />Description: interest.<br />There is nothing obscene about the human anatomy. It has been established in many Courts, for example, US Supreme Court and New Jersey's own Supreme Court. This will not change you.<br />Statute: NJSA 2C:34-3. Obscenity for men under 18<br />a. Definitions for purposes of this section:<br />Description: task.<br />It is worth noting how this definition differs from your definition of obscenity for an adult. It does not care whether the content has artistic or educational value and it comprises nudity paired with sensuality with sufficient impact to focus prurient interest on the region or action. This may not seem like a high bar to get underneath, but the fact that this qualification exists, means that nudity alone is not obscene to minors.<br /> [http://www.banktorvet.dk/login/?url=https://teennudist.xyz http://www.banktorvet.dk/login/?url=https://teennudist.xyz] If there were any sort of performance, dancing, display of a film, or anything else besides people hanging out in the nude around a pool and steam room, I might keep the minors house.<br />Statute: Description: level.<br />San Francisco Nudity Ban Protest
| + | 誰說我們付給私人補習免中介明星時，他們正獲得銀行家般的薪水。<br />上週，《現代教育》（Modern Education）在當地報紙上發表公開信，向競爭對手信標學院（Beacon College）的明星導師林逸妍（Lam Yat-yan）支付8500萬港元（如果他跳船並帶走25,000名學生）。<br />現在，Beacon已申請首次公開募股。那些很少閱讀其招股說明書的人可能會被其眾多警告之一震驚。<br />它說：“這樣的補習中介服務對我們集團的損失可能會導致學生入學率大幅下降，並對我們的業務產生重大不利影響。”<br />好吧，現年28歲的林先生是Beacon的頂級家教和搖錢樹，在上一個財政年度單身為學校賺了約1.31億港元，約佔其總收入3.28億港元的40％。如果您想知道Modern Education提出的8,500萬港元的刺激性報價僅僅是為了尋求關注，您可能會再考慮。 [http://arktig.hol.es/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=user&id=253696 大埔上門補習] 。他輸給Be火台將是災難性的，儘管到目前為止他說他不會離開。<br /><br />他在Facebook上寫道：“多出的5,000萬港元， [https://www.goodreads.com/user/show/115740915-buckner private tutor] 。”<br /><br />現代教育在信標上的引人注目的舉動不僅僅在於挖拔明星員工，還在於破壞主要競爭對手的上市野心。 [http://search.wi.gov/cpp/help/urlstatusgo.html?url=https://mytutors.com.hk/補習個案 tutor] 。 市場研究機構Euromonitor估計，該行業去年的收入超過10億港元。 大約有180,300名學生進入上門補習學校學習，其中大部分來自中學。<br />這種寄生的生意以我們的教育系統效率低下為生，並以年輕學生及其父母的不安全感為生。 該行業的年收入為10億港元，佔政府在中學教育上支出的4％以上。<br />當然，一些私人補習是不可避免的。 但是，如果我們的學校和教育系統運轉正常，父母就不必每年支付10億美元來為子女提供補習中介推薦幫助。 相反，私人補習已經成為學生之間不斷升級的軍備競賽。 這就是為什麼這是一個偉大的生意。<br /> |
