Donwload site

Webhard

Compared to the following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially in the case of videos, the next cloud must be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Merely to stream! I need to install another app again. Cloud alone isn't enough to stream.

Faster compared to the next cloud. About 20%.

Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It has a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

In comparison to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for a few selected sound sources. The next cloud only should be in a folder.

You should share a URL so you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, you will find a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's far better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. Specifically, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources within an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, assuming that communication is in good condition in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. This can be a significant advantage when contemplating domestic cloud services as a whole, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, if a picture is contained in a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. I feel like it's about once every two hours. 웹하드 순위 And if you listen to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you're in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos can be played immediately. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.



There are probably the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the net environment without installing programs on the computer. It's a tiny problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is absolutely no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but in the event that you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and work with MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude in comparison to office programs applied to computers.Is it obvious?)



Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Can be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for each photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While looking at Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without the blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world with regards to media reading.

There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.





The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster compared to the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit which can be uploaded from the free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There exists a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. To be able to work on a document, it is possible to choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

Regarding document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped on the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.



File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to talk about data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on a computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is much better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is now quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's may be the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there are also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is rather good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.